How To Build A Lp Gas Burner

MZ presents: Marco Saba in Cremona

inform our users that blog Wednesday, October 14 at 21.00, at the Library of Congress in Golf Course 72 Cremona Zero Movement organizes a meeting with the independent researcher Marco Saba during which your books will be presented:

BANKENSTEIN

Everything you never wanted to know about banks

and

OR THE BANK OR LIFE

The secret plots of the financial system World

important opportunity to understand the mechanisms that underlie the financial crisis we are experiencing.

you there!

Decidual Bleeding Pregnant

Sarò forse parte di quell'1% di valdostani "bastian contrari", ma lasciatemelo dire: sono VERAMENTE CONTENTO che i cosiddetti buoni benzina non verranno più assegnati from 2010!

First of massacres of insults, let me explain .

Step 1: Historical evolution
The reasons for the exemption of excise tax on fuel can be found in ' to rticle 14 (Title IV) of the Special Statute of the region, entitled "Zona Franca " . The text reads:

The territory of the Valle d'Aosta is located outside the customs line and is free zone.
Implementation details of zone will be established and agreed with the Region with state law.

Fine, paragraph 2 has never been implemented . Result: The VDA is not a free zone, nor ever will be (see below). To compensate for this lack of attribution - that would have been a real element of political and financial autonomy - the central state and the regional government agreed to certain exemptions : fuel, alcohol, sugar (I think there was something else, but I can not remember).

Then the principles of the European single market - one that has brought enormous benefits to all citizens of the old continent - found themselves clashing with those of the free zone , which represents an element of discriminatory advantage under the rules on state aid. Now, the fact remains that if the zone had been implemented first entry into force of the single market, nobody would have been able to rise: this was in fact the address of the European Court of Justice to evaluate some Free Zones French (excuse the pun language) existing since the 70s (this is the so-called Zones Franches Urbaines ). The fact is that due to foresight (note the irony) of our local political directors from the '60s onwards - and particularly in the '70s and '80s - the enclave was never implemented, to el Valle d'Aosta has so lost a huge opportunity, literally only , to set up a real financial system itself, separate from Italy, and implement a real policy autonomy. Just to be clear, would have arrived to threaten a referendum on independence as long as you have the free zone , as has been done in other parts of Europe.

Well, we know that it is therefore impossible to create a zone in VDA also because lately (Case Azores and the Basque Country), the Court of Justice has posted a triple test for the admissibility of tax systems to advantage:

1. Statute of Autonomy recognized Constitutional (ok, the Statute of the VDA voted with their constitutional law);
2. No appeal to the state coffers (One would love to discuss, given the distribution of nine tenths of the revenue from regional);
   
3. Presence of legislative autonomy at the regional level in Tax Matters ( and here the ass falls : The VDA has no autonomy in fiscal matters).

Basically, Forget finally the implementation of Article 14 of the Statute , even if the assessor Pastoret wanted us to believe otherwise (see his statement to Aostasera.it ). What we found is a "sweetener" that smacks of privilege and autonomy, a "help" to make us look more beautiful, rich and important of the other Italians. You know the truth? They took the piss for 60 years, we Valle d'Aosta.

Step 2: The European Union
Ah, the bad guys than the EU! We want to take away the petrol vouchers! not respect our independence! Good thing there is that cyber-ciofeche Facebook (copyright Vittorio Zucconi) and the legendary group "ABANDON THE PAPER VALLEY - without that would be real crisis" that has a pressure group over 3000 real Aosta Valley, with balls! Those who defend our right to pollute, but independently by the Italian Government, of course.

Now, I understand the incavolatura of the most , but we make a logical argument: if the zones are no longer eligible in the context of European law, let alone an exemption a single product! Even the experts seem less evident that we are faced with a distortion of competition .
The fact is that in 2003 (EC Directive 2003/96 ) the EC (European Community) the reorganization of the European energy market and prohibits, in fact, elements of tax concessions in this area. are expected, however exemptions listed in Annex II, one of which includes the case of Valle d'Aosta: however, the exemption expires on December 31, 2006 .
Some think that the good have been removed in January 2007, according to law? Of course not. This is because our regional administration (at the time the president was Caveri, who inherited the buck by contracting Vierin, Louvin and Perrin) asked for a further derogation , never officially granted. As demonstrated in the Commission Communication to the Council number 795/2007 of 12/12/2006 , VDA - through the State Legal - asked to maintain good order to avoid " " tourism " (ie folks who went to Switzerland for gas .... I think that even in St. Rhémy and the Bosses have never thought ...). The Commission said spades under Article 93 of the Treaty (harmonization of indirect), judging the measures taken - namely the exemption from excise duty on fuels - "not proportionate" . Amen. (I am not of course to bring the entire text of the EC documents, see the links if you are interested, they are very useful for better understanding).

Ergo, from the standpoint of "European" the matter is closed December 31, 2006.

Step 3: Elements political
Well, all Aosta know the importance that the policy cover petrol vouchers: they are essentially an element of the electoral debate, a trump card for those who were able to protect . For this reason, the main national party and government, the Union Valdôtaine (UV), has always defended a sword, thinking more about how to keep them, rather than alternative series. For this lack of foresight I think we have to thank - first of all - the presidents of the early '90s, when the EC was being formed, including the desaparecido Bondaz Gianni, and - above all - Viérin Dino, who has not never addressed the issue with the clarity and rigor that it would take. The UV

the paradox to collect signatures (!) To be sent to the European Parliament (EP) to defend the good In the name of autonomy that can not be more empty. Apart from the fact that sending a petition to Parliament or send it to the house of Huckleberry Hound Bau would have the same outcome (ie - I say to those who were not with a sense of humor - nil) Whereas the powers of Euro MPs, I wonder, but has never seen a party of government collecting signatures? But I say, you hold the ball of the region for decades, you can do - legally - whatever you want, and you stand to collect signatures? But are you crazy? I remember when I was on stage at the EU Commission (DG TAXUD, the one that deals with taxes), a civil servant (which obviously I will not name) who was responsible appropriate, when I told her that I was valdostano I snorted at him, "Ah yes, the Aosta Valley. Those who have come to cry on my knees ..." . My sense of patriotism was hard hit, I assure you.

We'll see what effects this will have on the political affair. You want my prediction? No effect, because the majority of government is already focusing on "We did everything possible, we had no alternative, asks him to Europe ...." . Ballista profession.

Step 4: What to do?
Panic! And now? We have to pay full price for gasoline? And what do we do? now so that will be real crisis! (see Facebook). Before no, instead. Crisis was only from Pont-Saint-Martin-down, or past the Col du Petit Saint Bernard. Think maybe we'll go more bike! Horror! We Aosta cycling just like on TV, or when the Tour moves on our side! Or maybe we should use more public transport .... but if they suck! No, no, rather we will walk! But what the heck, turn up a megalopolis as it is impossible Aosta .... and how will we do when it rains or - Worse! - It snows? How did our grandparents? It covered well and went to work the same? Noooo ..... impossible, probably if they were at home waiting for the thaw in April ....

I hope you caught the mild (self-) criticism of the local society. However, everyone will do what he wants, most people will complain to me and increase stomach acid. If I ask the ulcer is damage to those bad guys who have taken the EU's good here.

What is most important is: do with those 30-35 million Euro YEAR that the regional administration will find itself in the pockets from 2010? have the money of our duties, we will pay when we will do the full. For the charity, around a fifth of the last six on the Lotto, crumbs, but still 30 million euros!
Well, our State Government has decided to assign the so-called good heating. adequate, but transient , I hope. With that money you can do many things: first, why do not you do something optical 2020? (European strategy to reduce CO2 emissions by 20% and the rise of the renewable sources by 20% by 2020). Why not encourage the purchase and use of hybrid vehicles , or methane ? The gas methane is closest to the Valley in Montalto Dora! Or, what about the status of projects on logistics platform in Aosta? And invest on public transport, which requires? Or, the railroad : serving about 250 million total for action on the Torino-Aosta (Pastoret said it).

In short, you can do much, much. Only one thing you should do: without knowing the catkins.